Viral Blogging: What is the Price of Profiting from the Politics of Bigotry and Hate?
Filed Under: Law of Attraction · Uncategorized
Filed Under: Law of Attraction · Uncategorized
By: Heidi Whitaker
On an Elementary School Playground, They’re Considered Name-Calling Bullies. In the Blogosphere and other Media Venues, They’re Journalists or “Concerned Citizens Exercising Their Right to Free Speech”.
In Viral Copy: Trading Words for Traffic, Brian Clark discusses eleven ways that bloggers can viralize their posts. (Obtain a copy of Brian’s Viral Blogging Free Report) Brian ends his report with a warning to “Avoid the Dark Side” when seeking attention for your blog. Brian then recounts the story of how the 1970’s fictional radio station manager Arthur Carlson, of the sitcom WKRP in Cincinnati, arranged to have live turkeys dropped out of a helicopter as a Thanksgiving publicity stunt. Because turkeys cannot fly, dropping the birds to their deaths did not bring the radio station the kind of publicity that they desired. Brian’s message: Not all publicity is good publicity; Avoid attention-getting schemes akin to dropping turkeys out of a helicopter.
It was Brian’s advice that came to mind as I spent a few weeks in the blogosphere looking for information about the leading presidential candidates. My intention was to learn the candidates’ positions on issues that affect the self-employed. What I found instead left me feeling as though I was wading through miles of virtual turkey carnage.
My search made it painfully apparent that splatting certain turkeys is not only socially acceptable, it is as American as waving the flag at a Fourth of July parade. Turkeys practicing “weird” religions, turkeys married to guys named Bill, dieting Evangelical turkeys, or turkeys that happen to share the same middle name as a terrorist seem to be fair game. These unfortunate gobblers bring a gladiator colosseum-sized crowd anxious to watch the flightless birds plunge to their deaths from America the Beautiful’s spacious skies onto her amber waves of grain.
I suppose you could look at it as pure genius - Post an article to your blog poking a little fun at individuals, groups, or ideologies that readers love to hate. Then watch the site counter and number of bigoted comments rise. It is the seemingly perfect formula for successful and profitable blogging, but it comes at a greater price.
Words do not stay words forever. They lead to action. In a sense, hateful words will eventually become the proverbial sticks and stones that do the bone breaking. On a similar note, the Mormon chapel behind my home was vandalized a few weeks ago. Mormon buildings in various states have been vandalized and/or burned over the past month. I don’t know what investigators found as the fire catalyst of the house of worship burned in Arizona, but I believe it was fueled by a rising acceptance of Mormon bashing during this presidential campaign.
A climate of mean-spirited political bantering also encourages our children to tease and bully. Bobby Barvish of The MuslimForum of Utah calls this “trickle down bigotry”. In a recent interview with me, Mr. Barvish agreed that current prejudices blatantly expressed during our presidential primary campaigns have worsened the atmosphere for law-abiding Muslim Americans and their children.
Don’t particularly care about bigotry toward Muslims or Mormons?
Well, what about your own kids?
Don’t think for one minute that we grown-ups can go around name-calling and not expect our nation’s children to do the same. The message we are sending our children is that it is okay to tease, pick on, make fun of, discriminate against, or hate someone because of their name, their religion, their gender, their race, their general beliefs, etc.
According to Washington State Lt. Gov. Barc Owen: “Bullying occurs once every seven minutes on school playgrounds…By the age 24, 60% of identified childhood bullies (are) convicted of a crime.” -http://www.ltgov.wa.gov/speeches/OregonWaSheriffsConference.html
Perhaps a no less dangerous bully is now the cyber kind. Cyber bullying was brought to national attention with the suicide death of middle school student, Megan Meier, after being tormented on MySpace. According to polls, 90% of kids say that they have been hurt online in some way. (Source) In 2007 alone, 32% of teenagers claim to have been victims of cyberbullying (CNN.com).
If you want to see prime examples of cyber bullying, type Hillary Clinton’s name into a search engine. You’ll find sites whose sole purpose is to make fun of her. (And we wonder why kids today can be so mean…) While you are at it, check out how blogger Jane Genova treats Mike Huckabee’s sons. (Let’s not settle for belittling a candidate’s religion, middle name, heritage, or marital issues. Let’s beat up on their kids to make sure that we have completely desecrated everything that they hold dear.)
Certain subjects should be off-limits out of common decency. Running for office doesn’t give America the right to rip to pieces everything that is sacred or important to a candidate.
I am not implying that pointing out a candidate’s policies or behavior of which you do not agree amounts to bigotry or cruelty. I am simply saying that leaving comments in blogs or on YouTube proclaiming things like “all Mormons are bunch of #!*% idiots that deserve what they get”, “you can’t trust a candidate whose name sounds like a #&%* terrorist”, or “that woman is an ugly #&!* and needs an exorcism” is eventually going to lead to more prison over-crowding. (And cyber journalists/commentators posting articles to incite such comments for profit and personal gain are just as bad if not worse!)
Last week, I had a chance to discuss this topic with Scott Allen. Scott is the About.com Guide to Entrepreneurs. He is also the co-author of The Virtual Handshake: Opening Doors and Closing Deals Online. (Click here to grab a free copy of Scott’s eBook.) Scott’s advice to me sums it up best: “In our business and in our lives, peacemaking cannot be a hobby. It has to be a way of business or it is not a way of life.” Scott also went on to say, “We spend more waking-hours working than anything else. You can’t work towards peace in the world if you take an antagonistic approach to business or support others in doing the same… If you are profiting off of bigotry, what does that say about you?”
NOTE: I have not included links to the most bigoted, vile, disturbing, or profane sites that I came across. I refuse to help spread their brand of hate.
























January 3rd, 2008 at 9:02 am
This article is a good reminder for all of us. Yes, it’s wonderful to live in a free country where we can think and say just about anything we want. But, on the other hand, everyone also needs to at least be civilized in their words and actions.
Not so many years ago, people who were crude and rude to others were considered ignorant or unlearned. Most of us tried to ignore these people, hoping they would go away. But it is becoming more apparent everyday that “these people”, rather than going away, have increased in numbers. What’s even worse is that their words and actions have become more acceptable in our modern and enlightened world.
We have all gotten angry and said something in the heat of the moment that we later regret. Hopefully we apologized for our unkind words and went on to do better. But apologizing and being better or kinder seems to be far from “these people’s” minds and hearts. They spend time and money to hurt others who don’t agree with them. Why does being passionate about their beliefs mean they must lash out so spitefully to anyone who doesn’t have the same belief?
The time has come to let “these people” know that this type of hateful behavior is no longer acceptable. We have to speak up and be an example to others. Let your kind and gentle voice be heard. Take the time to spread some goodwill. Let’s do all we can to bring this country back to a more civilized and more decent place to live. Come, let us reason together - start today to be a part of something good!
January 4th, 2008 at 8:38 am
This well written article gave me great pause. I am reminded of “Inside the Actors Studio” hosted by James Lipton. At the end of his interviews with top Hollywood celebrities, he asks ten questions by Bernard Pivot, one of which is “What profession other than your own would you not like to attempt?” I have often thought my response could be “politics” because of the ubiquitous mean spirited, dirt digging, slanderous, cruelty that is not only widely accepted but also promoted!
I believe men and women of great capacity and patriotism are not in office today because of the hate mongering involved in running. And it is true that these sleaze tactics are not confined to the candidate but are targeted also to children, siblings, and friends–it seems that anyone who has had interaction with the candidate at anytime for any reason is “fair game.”
And how quickly it spreads and just as quickly lives and reputations are damaged or destroyed.
We should honor those who choose to run whether we agree with their positions or not. They are men and women of great courage.
January 4th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Great article and definitely food for thought. Politics has always been a dirty business, with the personal as well as the professional attack. But the internet, you tube, and blogging has opened up all new avenues for anyone and everyone to say what they want without, it seems, any boundaries.
Thanks for the links to the two e-books…I’ll be reading both of them.
Cheers,
Liz
January 4th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Carol,
Well said. It is all a matter of what we have allowed to become acceptable.
Sandra,
My concern is that we will eventually get to the point that “good men and women” will no longer be willing to put their families through the dirtier than dirty politics. What then?
Liz,
The internet also allows people to be anonymous. People do and say what they would never do or say face to face. I think this is what has made things much worse.
You are welcome for the e-Books.
Heidi
January 8th, 2008 at 2:14 am
[…] To learn more about the effects of the politics of hate visit http://workfromhomechoices.com/blog/viral-blogging-what-is-the-price-of-profiting-from-the-politics-… […]
January 8th, 2008 at 4:52 am
[…] To read about what using political bigotry in blogging is doing to America, visit http://workfromhomechoices.com/blog/viral-blogging-what-is-the-price-of-profiting-from-the-politics-… […]
January 17th, 2008 at 9:08 am
[…] To read about what using political bigotry in blogging is doing to America, visit http://workfromhomechoices.com/blog/viral-blogging-what-is-the-price-of-profiting-from-the-politics-… […]
January 21st, 2008 at 9:47 pm
[…] Heidi, who maintains a blog about working from home, looks at the effect of blogging on elections… […]
January 22nd, 2008 at 10:46 am
[…] Whitaker presents Viral Blogging: What is the Price of Profiting from the Politics of Bigotry and Hate? posted at Work from Home Choices, saying, “Article on what happens when political punditry […]
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:07 pm
[…] To read about what using political bigotry in blogging is doing to America, visit http://workfromhomechoices.com/blog/viral-blogging-what-is-the-price-of-profiting-from-the-politics-… […]
May 21st, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Character assasination is easy and effective online. For some reason seeing a statement in print automatically gives it credence in most peoples mind. In my mind those using it expose themselves as the cowards they truely are when they won’t reference their source of information or use their true name. Still I find it difficult to be cautious when I read something that tends to substantiate something that I already believe to be true.